Donna K.
Truth Seeker
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2018
- Messages
- 1,279
- Reaction score
- 2,769
- Points
- 203
- Age
- 70
- Location
- The very Haunted Wood's... Ozarks
I think stating reality as an 'illusion' is a misnomer. Reality is a 'concept'. Non-tangible. So 'reality' can not be an illusion... if you see. 'Physical Reality' then would also be a misnomer. Physical is a State of Being, as in involving mass. Reality is a concept, as in idea.
So... a physical being can perceive its 'surroundings' in this way or that, and I agree that perception is a very individual thing... so every individual being may perceive differently. This 'perception' is equated with the physical form. So, perception belongs to being. Every human, for instance, might personally perceive color's, form's, sounds, smells, etc... quite differently. But this would not affect the physical or mass in general. My blue might be different than your blue -- but there would be no way to determine that. Blue is just Blue.
On the other hand... because reality is a concept, it could definitely be affected by and is affected by, acceptance of an individual concept joined by other's who share that particular concept. At some point, there will become a large enough consensus that the concept is accepted as The Reality. This is what we believe to be our reality and therefore it is. This would dictate accepted moral code, behavioral expectations, religious or Spiritual views, etc... for the whole of the group. Thus, these codes of acceptance allow a concept to build into a reality. As those code's change, so does the reality.
I have dealt with this argument before and think it's hogwash. I say that all matter IS and Mathematician's and Physicist's attempt to capture IS with a mathematical formula. If they can't -- they want to change the IS so they can. IS came before language and that is what mathematics is... Language. Theoretical Physicist come up with a concept, hand it off to mathematicians, and they attempt to write the concept into a code/language using mathematics. Whether they can or not, does not dispute the fact of IS... speaking of a reality that is 'illusion'. Just saying.
So... a physical being can perceive its 'surroundings' in this way or that, and I agree that perception is a very individual thing... so every individual being may perceive differently. This 'perception' is equated with the physical form. So, perception belongs to being. Every human, for instance, might personally perceive color's, form's, sounds, smells, etc... quite differently. But this would not affect the physical or mass in general. My blue might be different than your blue -- but there would be no way to determine that. Blue is just Blue.
On the other hand... because reality is a concept, it could definitely be affected by and is affected by, acceptance of an individual concept joined by other's who share that particular concept. At some point, there will become a large enough consensus that the concept is accepted as The Reality. This is what we believe to be our reality and therefore it is. This would dictate accepted moral code, behavioral expectations, religious or Spiritual views, etc... for the whole of the group. Thus, these codes of acceptance allow a concept to build into a reality. As those code's change, so does the reality.
To some physicists, this indicates that all the matter, with its solidity and concreteness, is an illusion that only the mathematical apparatus they devise in their theories is truly real, not the perceived world the apparatus was created to describe in the first place, says Kastrup.
I have dealt with this argument before and think it's hogwash. I say that all matter IS and Mathematician's and Physicist's attempt to capture IS with a mathematical formula. If they can't -- they want to change the IS so they can. IS came before language and that is what mathematics is... Language. Theoretical Physicist come up with a concept, hand it off to mathematicians, and they attempt to write the concept into a code/language using mathematics. Whether they can or not, does not dispute the fact of IS... speaking of a reality that is 'illusion'. Just saying.