Politics Trans-Pacific Partnership

Malakai

Active Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
144
Reaction score
205
Points
43
Age
42
Since the outrage over a flag, or something like that, as well as the judgement on gay marriage :grinning:, I got to thinking "ok, so what are they really up to?" as seems to be the case when a major story is happening, they always slide something under the radar.

Well, seems like this is it. Anybody else heard anything on this?

 
Since the outrage over a flag, or something like that, as well as the judgement on gay marriage:grinning:, I got to thinking "ok, so what are they really up to?" as seems to be the case when a major story is happening, they always slide something under the radar.

Well, seems like this is it. Anybody else heard anything on this?

I usually don't agree with much of anything from Cenk Uygur or anyone at TYT with their liberal/progressive political and social views. It was refreshing to actually hear him go against Obama and not find an out for the administration.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: surge and Debi
11540898_10153440297769776_7643132925085858120_n.jpg
 
https://www.the-newshub.com/us-politics/us-senate-votes-to-pass-tpp-fast-track-legislation

The fast-track bill for Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) passed Senate on Wednesday, June 24. The fast-track bill, named Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), received 60 “Yea” votes and 38 “Nay” votes while 2 senators did not vote.
The TPA is nicknamed fast-track because of the authority it gives to the President to speed up the process of trade bills in Congress, forcing members to vote on a bill without the ability to change its contents or add amendments. Therefore, if the TPA is passed, it will become easier for Obama to pass TPP.
The TPP is an international free trade bill, much like the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Central American Free Trade Agreement were. Such bills have caused mass outsourcing of jobs, resulting in higher unemployment rates and lower job certainty.

However, there are many parts to the bill beyond the free trade sections. For instance, the bill strengthens intellectual property laws so copyrights can be enforced while they are still pending. Also, corporations gain the power to challenge any law that would damage their future profits. Access to prescription drugs would be limited as generic drugs would be removed from US pharmacies. Finally, no expiration date is set on TPP which means that once it’s here, it’s here to stay.
Countries included in TPP are the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Canada, Japan, Vietnam, Singapore, Peru, Chile, Malaysia, and Brunei. Other countries, including China and South Korea, have shown interest in joining the agreement.

Demonstrations against TPP/TPA have taken place in the United States and New Zealand, among others, but public awareness of the bills were low until recently due to the secrecy of TPP’s creation and a lack of exposure in mainstream media.
Many senators, including Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Rand Paul, have spoken out in opposition of TPP. All three of them voted “nay” during Wednesday’s Senate vote. Ted Cruz originally supported the bill, but began opposing it on 23 June.
The TPA had passed the Senate before, but the bill was later blocked in the House by both Democrats and Republicans. However, changes have been made to satisfy both sides, meaning TPA will likely pass the House next time it is voted on.
 
...public awareness of the bills were low until recently due to the secrecy of TPP’s creation...
This is the sort of thing that angers me. Half the people are already asleep, and 90% of the other half are too busy to pay full attention. Yet, they still knew this thing would incite outrage if people knew about it. No legislation should be passed under these circumstances. Full public disclosure of all language or it shouldn't be legal!
 
This is the sort of thing that angers me. Half the people are already asleep, and 90% of the other half are too busy to pay full attention. Yet, they still knew this thing would incite outrage if people knew about it. No legislation should be passed under these circumstances. Full public disclosure of all language or it shouldn't be legal!
Absolutely! If they're afraid to tell us the language and content, then they already know we're not going to agree with it. That's where a few of the Repub candidates went right off my list of considerations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: surge