Technology Microsoft Linux!

surge

Linux Inside!
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Messages
6,759
Reaction score
7,919
Points
113
Location
East of the Rockies
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/0...repeat_microsoft_has_developed_its_own_linux/

Sitting down? Nothing in your mouth?

Microsoft has developed its own Linux distribution. And Azure runs it to do networking.

Redmond's revealed that it's built something called Azure Cloud Switch (ACS), describing it as “a cross-platform modular operating system for data center networking built on Linux” and “our foray into building our own software for running network devices like switches.”

Kamala Subramaniam, Redmond's principal architect for Azure Networking, writes that: “At Microsoft, we believe there are many excellent switch hardware platforms available on the market, with healthy competition between many vendors driving innovation, speed increases, and cost reductions.”

(Translation: Microsoft partners, we mean you no harm.)

“However, what the cloud and enterprise networks find challenging is integrating the radically different software running on each different type of switch into a cloud-wide network management platform. Ideally, we would like all the benefits of the features we have implemented and the bugs we have fixed to stay with us, even as we ride the tide of newer switch hardware innovation.”

More at site.

_______________________________________________________


What all this means, basically, is that Microsoft now admits that their own operating system can't handle networking as well as Linux. As I have been saying for years, Linux > Windows. :D
 
Nice one. How are you applying this information? *checks off one more 'I told you so' box next to surge's name*
 
Azure's internal architecture does not allow for hardware based network infrastructure (switches, routers, network taps, firewalls, et cetera), so it makes sense that they would implement software network infrastructure. It makes a certain kind of sense that they would use a very stripped down distribution of Linux to build this functionality on top of. It also makes sense that they are not using, for example, Openstack's virtual networking infrastructure because... well... it is kind of frightening to deal with.

They are not selling this as a product, they are using it internally as part of their service. It makes for good press copy, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: surge and Armand
_______________________________________________________

What all this means, basically, is that Microsoft now admits that their own operating system can't handle networking as well as Linux. As I have been saying for years, Linux > Windows. :D[/QUOTE]

Hell, we all knew that. The problem with microsoft is they make everything user friendly and you get trolls. I hate windows for that simple fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: surge and 7Critter