Loch Ness Study results

Debi

Owner/Admin
Staff
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
242,051
Reaction score
235,410
Points
315
Location
South of Indy
Loch Ness monster study results 'surprising' - Unexplained Mysteries

news-urquhart-castle.jpg


A recent effort to trawl Loch Ness for potential 'monster' DNA has reportedly yielded some interesting results.
The study, which was led by New Zealand scientist Professor Neil Gemmell, aimed to use DNA sampling techniques to find out whether there was any scientific basis for the monster legend.

Now at last, almost a year after the DNA samples were collected, Prof Gemmell and his team have almost finished the analysis and will be announcing the full results at a conference next month.

From the findings released so far, the team has managed to identify the DNA of 15 different species of fish and a whopping 3,000 species of bacteria, among other things.

Part of the study also involved investigating the validity of various monster hypotheses such as whether or not the creature could be a prehistoric reptile, a sturgeon or a giant catfish.

"Is there anything deeply mysterious ?" said Gemmell. "Hmm. It depends what you believe. Is there anything startling? There are a few things that are a bit surprising."

"We've tested each one of the main monster hypotheses and three of them we can probably say aren't right and one of them might be."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paintman and TonyM
Loch Ness monster study results 'surprising' - Unexplained Mysteries

news-urquhart-castle.jpg


A recent effort to trawl Loch Ness for potential 'monster' DNA has reportedly yielded some interesting results.
The study, which was led by New Zealand scientist Professor Neil Gemmell, aimed to use DNA sampling techniques to find out whether there was any scientific basis for the monster legend.

Now at last, almost a year after the DNA samples were collected, Prof Gemmell and his team have almost finished the analysis and will be announcing the full results at a conference next month.

From the findings released so far, the team has managed to identify the DNA of 15 different species of fish and a whopping 3,000 species of bacteria, among other things.

Part of the study also involved investigating the validity of various monster hypotheses such as whether or not the creature could be a prehistoric reptile, a sturgeon or a giant catfish.

"Is there anything deeply mysterious ?" said Gemmell. "Hmm. It depends what you believe. Is there anything startling? There are a few things that are a bit surprising."

"We've tested each one of the main monster hypotheses and three of them we can probably say aren't right and one of them might be."

Interesting. That's Urquhart Castle which I've visited several times (pronounced urkart by the way).
 
Even if Nessie is not there its a good thing to study the ecosystem of the Loch and preserve its wildlife.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lynne and Debi