News WIFI making child sick

Debi

Owner/Admin
Staff
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
242,025
Reaction score
235,324
Points
315
Location
South of Indy
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2015/08/25/wifi-southboro-fay-school-sick/

wifi.jpg


SOUTHBORO (CBS) — A boarding school in central Massachusetts is being sued by parents who claim the school’s Wi-Fi signal is making their son sick.

The Worcester Telegram & Gazette reports that the unidentified plaintiffs have filed a lawsuit against the Fay School in Southboro. The parents say their 12-year-old son has “Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Syndrome” and has suffered headaches, nosebleeds and nausea since the school activated a stronger wireless signal in 2013.

The family is seeking $250,000 in damages and wants the school to switch to Ethernet cable Internet or turn down the Wi-Fi signal, according to The Telegram.

The school said in a statement that a company analyzed the Wi-Fi and found the signal is well within federal safety limits.

“Isotrope’s assessment was completed in January 2015 and found that the combined levels of access point emissions, broadcast radio and television signals, and other RFE emissions on campus ‘were substantially less than one ten-thousandth (1/10,000th) of the applicable safety limits (federal and state).” the school said.

WBZ-TV’s Dr. Mallika Marshall reported in June that a number of people believe invisible rays are making them sick , but some doctors say there is no evidence of a link between Wi-Fi and illness.
___________________________________________________________________________

Since this is such a new area, there has not been enough studies on this to say Yes or No, but I believe any energy running thro you may affect some people adversely. What do you think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: surge and DoTell
1. Little support for adverse health effects study here and in those citations.
2. Mobile devices provide greater exposure than WIFI, LANS, etc and in both cases exposure is within safety guidelines.
3. A third study addressed Specific Absorption Rates (SARs) and found no evidence for the existence of genotoxic or cytotoxic effects in the range of SARs investigated. These findings were confirmed in the two groups of five donors examined in the two laboratories and when the same slides were scored by two operators.
Long-term effects on fetus and children is not known at this time as there is no data on life long (40+ years).
 
  • Like
Reactions: surge
1. Little support for adverse health effects study here and in those citations.
2. Mobile devices provide greater exposure than WIFI, LANS, etc and in both cases exposure is within safety guidelines.
3. A third study addressed Specific Absorption Rates (SARs) and found no evidence for the existence of genotoxic or cytotoxic effects in the range of SARs investigated. These findings were confirmed in the two groups of five donors examined in the two laboratories and when the same slides were scored by two operators.
Long-term effects on fetus and children is not known at this time as there is no data on life long (40+ years).
And there's my research librarian hard at work! ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7Critter and DoTell
And there's my research librarian hard at work! ;)
Not really, this subject is interesting, and I run a file in my browser to book mark studies as I come across them. I tend to disregard 'popular' media reports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7Critter and Debi
Not really, this subject is interesting, and I run a file in my browser to book mark studies as I come across them. I tend to disregard 'popular' media reports.
We always appreciated your input on these things, DoTell! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DoTell