We've all commented on what makes a BAD paranormal investigator! Just watch some of the shows on TV and you have a pretty good idea that screaming, running, provoking and assuming aren't the traits of someone doing a good job of it.
So what do you think makes a GOOD investigator? Should they approach everything as a skeptic? Should tools be used like thermometers, recorders, laser fields, cameras? Should they simply sit and wait for phenomena to happen or should they try and interact with entities? Opinions, please!
Reminder: Join Jim Malliard tonight at 9PM EST for more on this topic. His guest is Allan Gilbreath, author, performer, skeptic, Editor and Manager at Dark Oak Press and Media. He'll be discussing what makes a good investigator and how to sell a book...in case any of you out there are writing one!
So what do you think makes a GOOD investigator? Should they approach everything as a skeptic? Should tools be used like thermometers, recorders, laser fields, cameras? Should they simply sit and wait for phenomena to happen or should they try and interact with entities? Opinions, please!
Reminder: Join Jim Malliard tonight at 9PM EST for more on this topic. His guest is Allan Gilbreath, author, performer, skeptic, Editor and Manager at Dark Oak Press and Media. He'll be discussing what makes a good investigator and how to sell a book...in case any of you out there are writing one!