Short story of H.D. strangeness from 20 years ago.

[Brian Jones]

This segment just played a little over two hours ago on a local AM radio station here in Seattle.. we recorded this a couple of weeks ago.. Bruce ( the host ) did a rough edit job.... I'm hoping to elaborate on this experience with Bob soon along with many other things on his Farside podcast... This was a weird one that I'll never forget.. I don't know if life is stranger than fiction... I'm not really sure life isn't fiction at times ~

Brian ... http://audiomedium.com/interviews/Crime Club 03-16-14.mp3

PS : In case anyone is interested in the so called reverse speech, I will link a presentation I made for this man ( the host of Crime Club ) He told me he'd received the CD I'd mailed to his PO Box just over a week ago.... I'm wondering if he will surprise me by offering me some level of feedback... the record of hearing from people to date as far as receiving feedback to many presentations I've produced and presented them with on a few challenging concepts ( with audio ) evens out to about 1.5%...

all I can say is that most of them really must not be able compute this material to the point that they vanish from my radar... I am so close to not letting this bother me after all these years, but it really does make me feel like an alien on Earth. Ok, here's the audio pres. :

http://audiomedium.com/classified/audio-psychic Brian Jones 02-20-14.mp3

 

[Naked Apple]

Brian, you were so lucky that you were not there when the shooter arrived. What a shame about the people who were shot. I guess it was not your time to go.

 

[Naked Apple]

As far as the backward speech, I can hear it when I am told what it is. Like with EVP, I can't make out anything until I am told what it supposed to be, then I totally hear it.

 

[Brian Jones]

Brian, you were so lucky that you were not there when the shooter arrived. What a shame about the people who were shot. I guess it was not your time to go.

I agree with you N.A., on all these points.... I still remember Phyllis' eyes, as clearly as if I'd been looking at them last night !

I have captured the newspaper article I found a few weeks ago using the printscreen feature of my computer... here they are :

http://audiomedium.com/classified/Farwestern 1 of 2.bmp

http://audiomedium.com/classified/Farwestern 2 of 2.bmp



http://audiomedium.com/classified/Farwestern 1 of 2.bmp

http://audiomedium.com/classified/Farwestern 2 of 2.bmp

 

[Brian Jones]

As far as the backward speech, I can hear it when I am told what it is. Like with EVP, I can't make out anything until I am told what it supposed to be, then I totally hear it.

What you are saying N.A. is extremely present for most people.. I won't make my case again here.. I've been doing it for far too long and too many times to no avail already.... I'll just reply with a single point/question.....

if the suggestion of the alleged audio ' message ' turns out to be accurate, couldn't this be the point of importance ?

 

[surge]

if the suggestion of the alleged audio ' message ' turns out to be accurate, couldn't this be the point of importance ?

For me, the answer would be no. If I can't decipher a message without being coached, then as far as I'm concerned anything I hear is tainted. At that point it's no longer what I hear, but what someone else has told me I'm supposed to hear.

 

[Brian Jones]

For me, the answer would be no. If I can't decipher a message without being coached, then as far as I'm concerned anything I hear is tainted. At that point it's no longer what I hear, but what someone else has told me I'm supposed to hear.

So let me see if you really mean what it appears as from your wording here... Even if someone else can interpret anomalous audio signals that prove to be accurate, if you cannot perceive these with your own senses, than the validated information is not valuable ?

 

[surge]

So let me see if you really mean what it appears as from your wording here... Even if someone else can interpret anomalous audio signals that prove to be accurate, if you cannot perceive these with your own senses, than the validated information is not valuable ?

If you are able to hear something in a recording that I cannot hear without first being told what it is I'm hearing, but that can be verified through independent means as accurate, then for research purposes there is still validity. For me there would be no personal value, since I didn't experience it. I would agree that you were able to hear, for example, "turn me on, dead man", but there would also still be the fact that I couldn't decipher it on my own. It wouldn't mean it wasn't there, just that I didn't hear it.

I've never seen a UFO, but I certainly believe that others have and that they exist.

 

[Brian Jones]

If you are able to hear something in a recording that I cannot hear without first being told what it is I'm hearing, but that can be verified through independent means as accurate, then for research purposes there is still validity. For me there would be no personal value, since I didn't experience it. I would agree that you were able to hear, for example, "turn me on, dead man", but there would also still be the fact that I couldn't decipher it on my own. It wouldn't mean it wasn't there, just that I didn't hear it.

I've never seen a UFO, but I certainly believe that others have and that they exist.

Well I'd have to say I agree with your reasoning, and I'm glad to know how you look at things you've described here !