Human Composting

Debi

Owner/Admin
Staff
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
242,051
Reaction score
235,410
Points
315
Location
South of Indy
Washington becomes first state ever to allow human composting

Gov. Jay Inslee, the Democrat from Washington, signed a bill into law on Tuesday that allows the composting of human bodies as an alternative to burials and cremations.

The Evergreen state is the first state to approve the measure after an earlier trial study that involved six backers who agreed to the organic reduction. The results were positive and the "soil smelled like soil and nothing else."

Troy Hottle, a fellow at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, told The Seattle Times earlier this year that the method is as "close to the natural process of decomposition [as] you’d assume a body would undergo before we had an industrialized society."

Licensed facilities in the state will offer a "natural organic reduction." The body is mixed with substances like wood chips into about two wheelbarrows’ worth of soil in a span of several weeks. Loved ones are allowed to keep the soil to spread, just as they might spread the ashes of someone who has been cremated — or even use it to plant vegetables or a tree.

in-art-close-icon-128x128-16481b937f87b244a645cdbef0d930f8.png

–– ADVERTISEMENT ––
"It gives meaning and use to what happens to our bodies after death," said Nora Menkin, executive director of the Seattle-based People’s Memorial Association, which helps people plan for funerals.
 
OK...I've read of this in sci fi books. The future appears to be here.

Thoughts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Donna K.
Don't think it matters what happens to your body when you leave it,but I don't think you should offend others beliefs.If it causes the least pollution for the Planet and no disease risk I'm all for it.
 
Personally, I'd be very concerned with the possible disease risks here. There are some things that don't just "go away" when they biodegrade.

Gonna have to side with Debi on this one. The long term issues of pollution caused by the decomposition of dead organics has already proven to show that micro-organism's containing possible dangerous signatures of disease leaching into the ground is a threat. There is a reason why we don't leave dead stuff around to decompose near human habitation. Think Plague. You would also need an extensive environmental survey of underground water source's, drainage, animal control (animals eat and excrete a whole bunch of places) and a bunch of other variants I can think of. They may be allowing labeling this as "green burial" but they also label 'all natural' which isn't and 'organic' which is not... etc. etc.

A politician of any kind from any side should not have the authority and probably doesn't legally have the authority to authorize this thing. Someone should probably challenge it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ozentity
Is cremation better for the environment and our welfare?At least it would kill any disease I would think.Buriels certainly don't kill everything as has been shown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Donna K.
Seems a shame not to be able to do it. I like the idea. No fuss. Back to mother earth in a simplistic way. Fine by me.
But, if it's not as clean and free of risk as it sounds, or as I thought/hoped it might be, there's that to consider.
Is it more of a problem with multiple burials close by perhaps? I'm still hanging on to hope here lol
What about the worms? Wouldn't they be eliminating disease somewhat?
 
I still find it hard to believe that 30 days is enough time to decompose a body completely,..(even in a rain forest environment fossils are still found)... what about the large bones and skull...things that last thousands of years in nature..... or do they run you through a grinder first or something, if so I would still rather be cremated....