Another salvo in the war on christians.

[surge]

http://christiannews.net/2015/03/23...campus-for-requiring-leaders-to-be-christian/

I'm going to guess that it would be okay for a Muslim group to require leadership to be Muslim or a women's group to require leadership to be women.

 

[Naked Apple]

That's just crazy. Unless people start making a ruckus and standing up for their rights, this kind of BS will continue to happen. Where are the angry mobs with pitchforks?

 

[Debi]

http://www.indystar.com/story/news/...ontroversial-religious-freedom-bill/70336706/

Indiana is about to pass this law to offer protection for those who wish to live by their religious convictions. Not sure how this is going to work, but here it is.

 

[Naked Apple]

http://www.indystar.com/story/news/...ontroversial-religious-freedom-bill/70336706/

Indiana is about to pass this law to offer protection for those who wish to live by their religious convictions. Not sure how this is going to work, but here it is.

What does that even mean? I thought we had religious freedom in this country?

 

[Debi]

Well, from what I understand of this new law, it would protect people who have religious beliefs, i.e. won't bake a cake for gay weddings, want Christian leaders for clubs, don't want to pay for abortions on their Obamacare, etc. Really not sure how that's going to translate within current Fed. law.

 

[Leo]

To me this translates as... I don't like your face, NO SOUP FOR YOU!

 

[Debi]

Yeah, I kinda feel the same way. Where do you draw the line with this law between religious freedom and discrimination? It looks a little vague to me there.

 

[Leo]

Honestly, they're better off generalizing it with a "NO PDA" sign or something. Everyone listens, everyone's served.