What a difference 10 years makes. Is this part of a slow disclosure process?
In the last 10 years we have found tens of thousands of planets. That really ups the odds.
What a difference 10 years makes. Is this part of a slow disclosure process?
NoIn the last 10 years we have found tens of thousands of planets. That really ups the odds.
This new cover makes a statement....the previous one was a question. Being National Georgraphic, known for being reliable, it has chosen to state there is life out there. That does hold a bit of weight.Both covers state the search is on for extraterrestrial life. Regardless of story titles, the only difference between a decade ago and now is whatever technological advances have been made in that time to enhance that search.
2+2 is no longer 4, Pluto is not a planet and history is not as we remember.......what has this generation done to our education system.......... I need to give back my diploma cause everything i learned was a sham....or maybe its the Mandela effect in super slow motion,....hmmmmNo
Pluto
That's all.
Shhhhh.....Chinese lanterns dude, your slipping....lolBoth covers state the search is on for extraterrestrial life. Regardless of story titles, the only difference between a decade ago and now is whatever technological advances have been made in that time to enhance that search.
This new cover makes a statement....the previous one was a question. Being National Georgraphic, known for being reliable, it has chosen to state there is life out there. That does hold a bit of weight.
Oh, I get it...really! lol I'm just saying...I find it's UNUSUAL for Nat Geo to put it out there like that.I believe there is life out there as well, but neither NG nor I have proof. Even if a top, peer reviewed professional journal like "The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review" made a similar statement, it would still require a search to prove extraterrestrial life exists.