one thing i cant quite figure out is that there are numerous sightings that describe bigfoot as being long shaggy type hair, but in almost all supposed photo's they take the patterson/gimlin route and they are more short hair, "fur" type creatures. which makes more sense i think but if that is the case then they are not as related to humans as thought, or their head hair would be extra-long, with short body hair, DNA and human type genetics just dont match up with either type very well. science just seems all mixed up on these things....lol