LOL And do WHAT with it? Terrorize the neighborhood?well.... I would add to the list, but honestly, I would LOOOVVVVEEEE to have an M-1 Abrams.....
LOL And do WHAT with it? Terrorize the neighborhood?well.... I would add to the list, but honestly, I would LOOOVVVVEEEE to have an M-1 Abrams.....
no worse than my 40 year old me project, an armoured bobcat equipped with a flamethrower!LOL And do WHAT with it? Terrorize the neighborhood?
Let me know if you require snow removal servicesCharleh has now weaponized landscape equipment.
Yeah he better shut his mouth until he converts his tanks into hybrids!
well.... I would add to the list, but honestly, I would LOOOVVVVEEEE to have an M-1 Abrams.....
The article said he uses his tank for charity car-crushing events! Sounds like fun to me, especially the cars of some people I've worked with in the past.LOL And do WHAT with it? Terrorize the neighborhood?
I totally agree with you on all counts. What a hypocritical idea. He has driven cars and planes and availed himself freely of the product. Doesn’t that make him an accessory by his standards. Really this is a classic example of using fame to push political views on the rest of us. Raising awareness of a problem and promoting alternative ideas is much more productive.Yeah, good luck with that. I agree, just a publicity stunt. The comparison doesn't even make sense to me. There are certain "costs" of civilization. If we did not advance on petroleum products, we would have advanced using some other form of fuel. I happen to believe they are not "fossil" fuels anyway, but that's an entire different discussion.