Alien-like skulls unearthed in Mexico

Debi

Owner/Admin
Staff
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
240,730
Reaction score
232,124
Points
315
Location
South of Indy
13 Alien-like Skulls unearthed in Mexico

Researchers in Mexico have made a shocking discovery while excavating the ancient burial site of “El Cementerio” located in the vicinity of Onavas. Experts have unearthed 25 skulls, 13 of which had an alien-like shape, with features that did not resemble any known species on Earth. The pre-Hispanic cemetery was discovered in the northern Mexican State, and out of the 25 individuals that were excavated, 17 of them were minors without symptoms of disease.

The most mysterious were the thirteen which had elongated skulls, five of which had mutilated teeth.



A connection to the mysterious Paracas Skulls? An expert in the subject, Brien Foerster talked about the mysterious Paracas Skulls which allegedly show a species unknown to scientists. Foerster added that the skulls seem to have a cranial volume much larger than normal skulls. In other words, 25% larger than typical skulls of human beings.

It is impossible to increase cranial volume through ‘cranial deformation’. These skulls also weigh 60% more when compared to normal human skulls. Forester doesn’t stop here as he noted several other differences. According to Foerster, the skulls also contain two small holes located in the rear of the skull. These holes are perpendicular to the cranial suture located on the parietal plate.



Foerster adds that every normal human skull is composed of three major bone plates: the frontal plate, which ends at the upper part of the forehead and the two parietal plates which lie behind this, intersecting the frontal plate making a “T” shape.

Intentional deformation? Yes perhaps, you are right, but there is more! Researchers determined that most of the skulls are elongated as a result of intentional deformation. A constant force was applied to the cranium for a long time which caused them to form an elongated skull. Strangely, the volume and weight of the skeletons is anything but normal. According to researchers, the cranial volume of the “Paracas Skulls” is up to 25% larger and 60% heavier than conventional human skulls. And there is more to the mysterious skulls. The human skull is composed of two parietal bones located between the frontal and occipital, forming the sides of the calvaria. The calvaria or also called skullcap, is made up of the superior portions of the frontal bone, occipital bone, and parietal bones. The “Paracas Skulls” only have one!


“Cranial deformation has been used by different societies in the world as a ritual practice or for distinction of status within a group or to distinguish between social groups,” said researcher Cristina García Moreno, an archaeologist at Arizona State University. “The reason why these individuals at El Cementerio deformed their skulls is still unknown.”

“The most common comment I’ve read from people that see the pictures of cranial deformation has been that they think that those people were ‘aliens,'” García added. “I could say that some say that as a joke, but the interesting thing is that some do think so. Obviously we are talking about human beings, not of aliens.”
 
So are the skulls humans who underwent elongation or non-human ? Hmmm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Debi
Sounds like he's leaning to a non human origan. I tend to agree. I hope they get the genetic testing needed to say for sure
 
13 Alien-like Skulls unearthed in Mexico

Researchers in Mexico have made a shocking discovery while excavating the ancient burial site of “El Cementerio” located in the vicinity of Onavas. Experts have unearthed 25 skulls, 13 of which had an alien-like shape, with features that did not resemble any known species on Earth. The pre-Hispanic cemetery was discovered in the northern Mexican State, and out of the 25 individuals that were excavated, 17 of them were minors without symptoms of disease.

A connection to the mysterious Paracas Skulls? An expert in the subject, Brien Foerster talked about the mysterious Paracas Skulls which allegedly show a species unknown to scientists. Foerster added that the skulls seem to have a cranial volume much larger than normal skulls. In other words, 25% larger than typical skulls of human beings.

It is impossible to increase cranial volume through ‘cranial deformation’. These skulls also weigh 60% more when compared to normal human skulls.

“The most common comment I’ve read from people that see the pictures of cranial deformation has been that they think that those people were ‘aliens,'” García added. “I could say that some say that as a joke, but the interesting thing is that some do think so. Obviously we are talking about human beings, not of aliens.”

Click on the quoted message to expand it. There are two things about that.
1. They say these bones belong to a species that is unknown to scientists, but bones and fossils are all we have to go off of to know for a fact dinosaurs existed. So why are they insisting they're unknown? It's known now, so give it a name, and normalize it in a biological species hierarchy.

2. The last quoted sentence is confusing and ambiguous. Foerster says these bones aren't from humans, but Garcia says she's talking about humans. What does she mean when she says she's talking about humans? What exactly is it that she says is human? The bones? Or is she referring to the humans whose skulls were known to have been elongated? Is Garcia not commenting at all on the non-human bones?

Not trying to tear it apart, I'm just trying to understand what she's trying to say. But instead of beating around the bush, scientists need to do something about the non-human bones that are human-like. Categorize them. Don't just say, "Yep, we don't know where they came from" while continuing to say we're the only ones in the universe.

This topic reminds me of something else. I'll have to find it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Debi
Click on the quoted message to expand it. There are two things about that.
1. They say these bones belong to a species that is unknown to scientists, but bones and fossils are all we have to go off of to know for a fact dinosaurs existed. So why are they insisting they're unknown? It's known now, so give it a name, and normalize it in a biological species hierarchy.

2. The last quoted sentence is confusing and ambiguous. Foerster says these bones aren't from humans, but Garcia says she's talking about humans. What does she mean when she says she's talking about humans? What exactly is it that she says is human? The bones? Or is she referring to the humans whose skulls were known to have been elongated? Is Garcia not commenting at all on the non-human bones?

Not trying to tear it apart, I'm just trying to understand what she's trying to say. But instead of beating around the bush, scientists need to do something about the non-human bones that are human-like. Categorize them. Don't just say, "Yep, we don't know where they came from" while continuing to say we're the only ones in the universe.

This topic reminds me of something else. I'll have to find it.
I agree. Let's start a record of them like other fossils and bones. These things tend to disappear tho
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taliesin
I agree. Let's start a record of them like other fossils and bones. These things tend to disappear tho
"That belongs in a museum!"

But seriously, if it was on display to the public permanently, then it would force change. I say do it before they're confiscated by people who exist but are powerful and secretive. Because then if they were taken, it would be obvious something's going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lynne and Debi
"That belongs in a museum!"

But seriously, if it was on display to the public permanently, then it would force change. I say do it before they're confiscated by people who exist but are powerful and secretive. Because then if they were taken, it would be obvious something's going on.
Like the bodies of giants that seem to disappear despite witness reports of them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lynne
I found this rock. It has a look of a skull. You can see an eye socket and teeth or so it seems. I would appreciate it if someone could tell me what this is. Thank you
 

Attachments

  • P_20170423_043457.jpg
    P_20170423_043457.jpg
    336.6 KB · Views: 170
  • P_20170423_042437.jpg
    P_20170423_042437.jpg
    402.1 KB · Views: 192
  • P_20170423_042522.jpg
    P_20170423_042522.jpg
    362.9 KB · Views: 184
I found this rock. It has a look of a skull. You can see an eye socket and teeth or so it seems. I would appreciate it if someone could tell me what this is. Thank you
Thanks for your post, Tina and Welcome to the ParaNormal Forum !
 
I found this rock. It has a look of a skull. You can see an eye socket and teeth or so it seems. I would appreciate it if someone could tell me what this is. Thank you
Hi Tina. I really don't know. Many times rocks can look like something and simply be a rock. Have you considered taking it to a natural history museum or nearby university? If it's something more then they would most likely be able to tell you.